Move dev-java/swtcalendar to main portage tree?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Move dev-java/swtcalendar to main portage tree?

Bugzilla from f.koester@tarent.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello list,

I am currently working on ebuilds which have swtcalendar as a dependency.

I do not see any reason why not moving dev-java/swtcalendar from
java-overlay to main portage tree, or am I missing something?

Regards,
Fabian

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=xFVm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Move dev-java/swtcalendar to main portage tree?

Alistair Bush-2
> Hello list,
>
> I am currently working on ebuilds which have swtcalendar as a dependency.
>
> I do not see any reason why not moving dev-java/swtcalendar from
> java-overlay to main portage tree, or am I missing something?

I suppose the question is....  Are any of those packages your working on end-
user applications.   From what I understand swtcalendar is just a library and
therefore we will not add it to the tree until it is required by an
application.  We don't have the man power to maintain libraries just for the
sake of them sadly.

Thanks

Alistair.

>
> Regards,
> Fabian

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Move dev-java/swtcalendar to main portage tree?

Bugzilla from f.koester@tarent.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>> I am currently working on ebuilds which have swtcalendar as a dependency.
>>
>> I do not see any reason why not moving dev-java/swtcalendar from
>> java-overlay to main portage tree, or am I missing something?
>
> I suppose the question is....  Are any of those packages your working on end-
> user applications.   From what I understand swtcalendar is just a library and
> therefore we will not add it to the tree until it is required by an
> application.  We don't have the man power to maintain libraries just for the
> sake of them sadly.

Ah, I understand.

And yes, I am working on an ebuild which provides an
end-user-application, which is called Hibiscus, an online-banking
software [1].

I also filed a bug-report for it [2], which also lists the dependencies
which are not yet packaged in Gentoo but I have created ebuilds for.

Although the ebuilds are already working (at least for me) so that one
can use the application productively, they still have some structural
flaws, the biggest one beeing missing Eclipse libraries like
eclipse-runtime, forms, jface, osgi and birt. Currently those
dependencies are not build from source but installed as binary. But I
will write a separate mail on this issue.

I thought I get Hibiscus' dependencies one after another into Gentoo
(java-overlay?) and started with hbci4java [3], the library which
implements the HBCI protocol and therefore provides the core banking
functionality for Hibiscus.

Although I have some experience with Java and Gentoo Packaging, I could
need a lot of help from the Java-team to manage this not-quite small
project.

Do you maybe have some advices for me on how to approach this task?

Regards,
Fabian


[1] http://www.willuhn.de/products/hibiscus/
[2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350663
[3] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350240
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=2PWS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----