XOM ebuild

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

XOM ebuild

Serkan Kaba-2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ken (mostly) and I gave a shot at bug 146593 bumping XOM in tree. After
a few iterations we have hit the issue that has been discovered in the
past, circular dependency on Jaxen. I'm asking if splitting xom to
xom-core and xom-jaxen is OK, as don in jdom.

- --
Sincerely,
Serkan KABA
Gentoo Developer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk1gS1EACgkQRh6X64ivZaK1mwCdF4/vEWbYGbICIkXD5o4gNtLV
vE0AmwS9GfY7POFZQPI2m58FNHKB6KNb
=bTAP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: XOM ebuild

Alistair Bush-2
> Ken (mostly) and I gave a shot at bug 146593 bumping XOM in tree. After
> a few iterations we have hit the issue that has been discovered in the
> past, circular dependency on Jaxen. I'm asking if splitting xom to
> xom-core and xom-jaxen is OK, as don in jdom.

Yes.  Please also file a bug with upstream.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: XOM ebuild

Serkan Kaba-2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 20-02-2011 03:52, Alistair Bush wrote:
>> Ken (mostly) and I gave a shot at bug 146593 bumping XOM in tree. After
>> a few iterations we have hit the issue that has been discovered in the
>> past, circular dependency on Jaxen. I'm asking if splitting xom to
>> xom-core and xom-jaxen is OK, as don in jdom.
>
> Yes.  Please also file a bug with upstream.
>
>
Upstream does more weird stuff checking out jaxen sources from scm
during xom build.

- --
Sincerely,
Serkan KABA
Gentoo Developer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk1gqxMACgkQRh6X64ivZaI1FACfRqeqK8wSPa2LeqfVsgef2L/0
ATEAn1sk7B/xH7wAZWJk9vgjdFBwQTdg
=uBZ+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: XOM ebuild

Alistair Bush-2
> On 20-02-2011 03:52, Alistair Bush wrote:
> >> Ken (mostly) and I gave a shot at bug 146593 bumping XOM in tree. After
> >> a few iterations we have hit the issue that has been discovered in the
> >> past, circular dependency on Jaxen. I'm asking if splitting xom to
> >> xom-core and xom-jaxen is OK, as don in jdom.
> >
> > Yes.  Please also file a bug with upstream.
>
> Upstream does more weird stuff checking out jaxen sources from scm
> during xom build.

Load your shotgun then. :)